EEPAC SOLUTIONS - TranZact AI

Back

Back to All Case Studies

EEPAC SOLUTIONS

EEPAC SOLUTIONS tightened shop-floor control with a centralised workflow

Standardising approvals and handovers so teams work off the same numbers.

₹16L/yr

Avoided expedite, rework and unplanned purchase costs for fabrication work

₹16L/yr

Avoided expedite, rework and unplanned purchase costs for fabrication work

48%

Reduction in daily coordination time across store and production

48%

Reduction in daily coordination time across store and production

4→2 days

Improvement in order-to-dispatch lead time with fewer last-minute follow-ups

4→2 days

Improvement in order-to-dispatch lead time with fewer last-minute follow-ups

How EEPAC SOLUTIONS operates

EEPAC SOLUTIONS is a medium fabrication manufacturing unit based in Nashik. Their day-to-day work involves coordinating orders, material availability, production execution and dispatch commitments. Earlier, updates were shared through a mix of Excel sheets, calls and WhatsApp, which made it hard to keep everyone aligned. By moving to a centralised workflow, the team standardised handovers, reduced rework in reporting, and improved execution predictability.

Fabrication

Industry

Fabrication

Industry

Medium

Company Size

Medium

Company Size

Nashik, India

Location

Nashik, India

Location

Dispatch readiness tracking for assemblies

Use Cases

Dispatch readiness tracking for assemblies

Use Cases

Challenges

Receivable status changed daily because part-payments were not tagged to specific invoices.

Rate differences and consumption variances created disputes with subcontractors.

Short/excess at dispatch led to urgent rework and multiple trips between store and floor.

Implementation: Centralised workflow with clear owners

Earlier, collections follow-ups were scattered and disputes reopened older invoices. This broke down on part-payments; the receivable view changed daily and escalations increased. We implemented a centralised workflow where each order, material requirement and update had a clear owner and timestamp. Collections follow-ups moved to a single list with dispute tagging so teams stopped chasing the wrong invoices. The practical outcome was fewer escalations, faster decisions, and dates that changed less often.

Stabilising planning with live WIP and material signals

Earlier, job-work material movement was tracked in registers and return status was unclear. This broke down on returns; shortages and rate differences led to repeated reconciliations. We implemented structured stage-wise tracking and checklists so work moved forward only when prerequisites were met. Material sent out and received back was logged against job-work orders, making shortages visible immediately. It also made owner reviews easier because key exceptions were visible without chasing the team. The practical outcome was that teams stopped re-entering the same data and acted on exceptions early.

Before: Too many moving parts, no single view

Earlier, dispatch readiness depended on people coordinating invoice, packing and transporter on calls. This broke down when transporter slots moved; finished goods were ready but paperwork and packing lagged behind. We implemented a single system of record connecting sales, purchase, production and dispatch so everyone worked off the same status. Dispatch checklists were run a day ahead so invoicing, packing and transporter booking stayed aligned. It also made owner reviews easier because key exceptions were visible without chasing the team. The practical outcome was smoother handovers between departments and more predictable daily execution.

More like this

Numakers Asia LLP

Numakers Asia LLP, a small packaging manufacturer in Surat, faced significant operational challenges, including miscommunication on vendor commitments and a lack of synchronization between dispatch processes. To address these issues, they implemented a centralized workflow that streamlined coordination across departments. This transformation led to improved execution predictability and reduced reliance on individual team members for updates. Discover how this approach not only stabilized their planning but also enhanced their overall operational efficiency.

Hira packaging solutions

Hira Packaging Solutions implemented a centralized workflow to tackle significant operational challenges, such as unclear work-in-progress quantities and disjointed communication across departments. This approach transformed their order-to-dispatch processes, leading to improved execution predictability and streamlined reporting. The team transitioned from reliance on scattered tools and outdated methods to a cohesive system, enhancing accountability and reducing the frequency of escalations. Discover how these strategic changes reshaped their daily operations and outcomes.

Omkar Industries

In a bid to enhance operational efficiency, Omkar Industries adopted a centralized workflow solution to tackle persistent coordination challenges. The company faced issues with inconsistent inventory tracking, conflicting reports from different systems, and difficulty in managing vendor follow-ups. By streamlining these processes, they aimed for smoother inter-departmental handovers and improved execution predictability, setting the stage for a more cohesive work environment.