PROTEGERE ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGIES LLP

Back

Back to All Case Studies

How PROTEGERE ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGIES LLP reduced firefighting using a single system of record

Bringing purchase, production and dispatch on one timeline—without adding complexity.

33%

Reduction in daily coordination time for electrical work

33%

Reduction in daily coordination time for electrical work

20%

Reduction in excess inventory across store and production

20%

Reduction in excess inventory across store and production

6→2 days

Improvement in order-to-dispatch lead time with fewer last-minute follow-ups

6→2 days

Improvement in order-to-dispatch lead time with fewer last-minute follow-ups

About PROTEGERE ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGIES LLP

PROTEGERE ELECTRICAL TECHNOLOGIES LLP is a small electrical manufacturing unit based in Jhajjar. Their day-to-day work involves coordinating orders, material availability, production execution and dispatch commitments. Earlier, updates were shared through a mix of Excel sheets, calls and WhatsApp, which made it hard to keep everyone aligned. By moving to a centralised workflow, the team standardised handovers, reduced rework in reporting, and improved execution predictability.

Electrical

Industry

Electrical

Industry

Small

Company Size

Small

Company Size

Jhajjar, India

Location

Jhajjar, India

Location

BOM-based production for panels/wiring kits

Use Cases

BOM-based production for panels/wiring kits

Use Cases

Challenges

Transporter availability was confirmed late, so finished goods piled up near the gate.

Vendor committed dates were verbal; delays were discovered only after repeated calls.

No standard follow-up cadence, so hot leads cooled down without visibility.

Controlling rework through traceability and holds

Earlier, dispatch readiness depended on people coordinating invoice, packing and transporter on calls. This broke down when transporter slots moved; finished goods were ready but paperwork and packing lagged behind. We implemented a centralised workflow where each order, material requirement and update had a clear owner and timestamp. Dispatch checklists were run a day ahead so invoicing, packing and transporter booking stayed aligned. The practical outcome was fewer escalations, faster decisions, and dates that changed less often.

Stabilising planning with live WIP and material signals

Earlier, vendor follow-ups were call-driven and depended on whoever remembered to push. This broke down during peak load—approvals got delayed and committed dates slipped without a simple exception view. We implemented a single system of record connecting sales, purchase, production and dispatch so everyone worked off the same status. The purchase team used one follow-up queue, logged committed dates, and escalated exceptions early. For electrical operations in Jhajjar, this reduced dependence on a single person for updates. The practical outcome was that teams stopped re-entering the same data and acted on exceptions early.

Dispatch readiness built into the daily routine

Earlier, enquiries and quotations were handled in different places, so reminders were inconsistent. This broke down when key people were busy; hot leads cooled because follow-ups were not standardised. We implemented a centralised workflow where each order, material requirement and update had a clear owner and timestamp. Sales worked a standard follow-up cadence with reminders and visibility of the latest quotation version. It also made owner reviews easier because key exceptions were visible without chasing the team. The practical outcome was smoother handovers between departments and more predictable daily execution.

More like this

Numakers Asia LLP

Numakers Asia LLP, a small packaging manufacturer in Surat, faced significant operational challenges, including miscommunication on vendor commitments and a lack of synchronization between dispatch processes. To address these issues, they implemented a centralized workflow that streamlined coordination across departments. This transformation led to improved execution predictability and reduced reliance on individual team members for updates. Discover how this approach not only stabilized their planning but also enhanced their overall operational efficiency.

Hira packaging solutions

Hira Packaging Solutions implemented a centralized workflow to tackle significant operational challenges, such as unclear work-in-progress quantities and disjointed communication across departments. This approach transformed their order-to-dispatch processes, leading to improved execution predictability and streamlined reporting. The team transitioned from reliance on scattered tools and outdated methods to a cohesive system, enhancing accountability and reducing the frequency of escalations. Discover how these strategic changes reshaped their daily operations and outcomes.

Omkar Industries

In a bid to enhance operational efficiency, Omkar Industries adopted a centralized workflow solution to tackle persistent coordination challenges. The company faced issues with inconsistent inventory tracking, conflicting reports from different systems, and difficulty in managing vendor follow-ups. By streamlining these processes, they aimed for smoother inter-departmental handovers and improved execution predictability, setting the stage for a more cohesive work environment.