Ray Enterprises
Ray Enterprises
Ray Enterprises
Ray Enterprises tightened shop-floor control with a centralised workflow

Ray Enterprises tightened shop-floor control with a centralised workflow

Ray Enterprises tightened shop-floor control with a centralised workflow

Turning daily follow-ups into a repeatable workflow across departments.

52%

Reduction in daily coordination time for electrical work

52%

Reduction in daily coordination time for electrical work

14%

Reduction in excess inventory across store and production

14%

Reduction in excess inventory across store and production

6→3 days

Improvement in order-to-dispatch lead time with fewer last-minute follow-ups

6→3 days

Improvement in order-to-dispatch lead time with fewer last-minute follow-ups

Hero Background

Inside Ray Enterprises

Inside Ray Enterprises

Ray Enterprises is a micro electrical manufacturing unit based in Ambala. Their day-to-day work involves coordinating orders, material availability, production execution and dispatch commitments. Earlier, updates were shared through a mix of Excel sheets, calls and WhatsApp, which made it hard to keep everyone aligned. By moving to a centralised workflow, the team standardised handovers, reduced rework in reporting, and improved execution predictability.

Workspace Icon

Electrical

Industry

Workspace Icon

Electrical

Industry

Workspace Icon

Micro

Company Size

Workspace Icon

Micro

Company Size

Workspace Icon

Ambala, India

Location

Workspace Icon

Ambala, India

Location

Workspace Icon

BOM-based production for panels/wiring kits

Use Cases

Workspace Icon

BOM-based production for panels/wiring kits

Use Cases

Challenges

Month-end reporting became a rework exercise because data lived in multiple files and chats.

No single schedule linked orders, material availability and machine loading.

PO approvals got stuck with managers, leading to last-minute buying and frequent expedite.

Controlling rework through traceability and holds

Controlling rework through traceability and holds

Controlling rework through traceability and holds

Earlier, masters and transactions were split across Excel, accounting exports and WhatsApp updates. This broke down at month-end; teams rebuilt the same report multiple times and still debated the numbers. We implemented structured stage-wise tracking and checklists so work moved forward only when prerequisites were met. Masters were cleaned once, and daily reporting pulled from the same transactions instead of manual consolidation. It also made owner reviews easier because key exceptions were visible without chasing the team. The practical outcome was smoother handovers between departments and more predictable daily execution.

Earlier, masters and transactions were split across Excel, accounting exports and WhatsApp updates. This broke down at month-end; teams rebuilt the same report multiple times and still debated the numbers. We implemented structured stage-wise tracking and checklists so work moved forward only when prerequisites were met. Masters were cleaned once, and daily reporting pulled from the same transactions instead of manual consolidation. It also made owner reviews easier because key exceptions were visible without chasing the team. The practical outcome was smoother handovers between departments and more predictable daily execution.

Cleaning masters to make reports match reality

Cleaning masters to make reports match reality

Cleaning masters to make reports match reality

Earlier, the daily plan was decided in fragments—by urgency, not by capacity and material signals. This broke down as soon as urgent orders came in; jobs were half-started and WIP piled up across stages. We implemented a centralised workflow where each order, material requirement and update had a clear owner and timestamp. Planning moved to a simple daily schedule linked to orders, capacity and material, reducing last-minute reshuffles. It also made owner reviews easier because key exceptions were visible without chasing the team. The practical outcome was smoother handovers between departments and more predictable daily execution.

Earlier, the daily plan was decided in fragments—by urgency, not by capacity and material signals. This broke down as soon as urgent orders came in; jobs were half-started and WIP piled up across stages. We implemented a centralised workflow where each order, material requirement and update had a clear owner and timestamp. Planning moved to a simple daily schedule linked to orders, capacity and material, reducing last-minute reshuffles. It also made owner reviews easier because key exceptions were visible without chasing the team. The practical outcome was smoother handovers between departments and more predictable daily execution.

Reducing month-end surprises with traceable transactions

Reducing month-end surprises with traceable transactions

Reducing month-end surprises with traceable transactions

Earlier, vendor follow-ups were call-driven and depended on whoever remembered to push. This broke down during peak load—approvals got delayed and committed dates slipped without a simple exception view. We implemented a centralised workflow where each order, material requirement and update had a clear owner and timestamp. The purchase team used one follow-up queue, logged committed dates, and escalated exceptions early. The practical outcome was that teams stopped re-entering the same data and acted on exceptions early.

Earlier, vendor follow-ups were call-driven and depended on whoever remembered to push. This broke down during peak load—approvals got delayed and committed dates slipped without a simple exception view. We implemented a centralised workflow where each order, material requirement and update had a clear owner and timestamp. The purchase team used one follow-up queue, logged committed dates, and escalated exceptions early. The practical outcome was that teams stopped re-entering the same data and acted on exceptions early.

More like this

Numakers Asia LLP

Numakers Asia LLP, a small packaging manufacturer in Surat, faced significant operational challenges, including miscommunication on vendor commitments and a lack of synchronization between dispatch processes. To address these issues, they implemented a centralized workflow that streamlined coordination across departments. This transformation led to improved execution predictability and reduced reliance on individual team members for updates. Discover how this approach not only stabilized their planning but also enhanced their overall operational efficiency.

Read More

Hira packaging solutions

Hira Packaging Solutions implemented a centralized workflow to tackle significant operational challenges, such as unclear work-in-progress quantities and disjointed communication across departments. This approach transformed their order-to-dispatch processes, leading to improved execution predictability and streamlined reporting. The team transitioned from reliance on scattered tools and outdated methods to a cohesive system, enhancing accountability and reducing the frequency of escalations. Discover how these strategic changes reshaped their daily operations and outcomes.

Read More

Omkar Industries

In a bid to enhance operational efficiency, Omkar Industries adopted a centralized workflow solution to tackle persistent coordination challenges. The company faced issues with inconsistent inventory tracking, conflicting reports from different systems, and difficulty in managing vendor follow-ups. By streamlining these processes, they aimed for smoother inter-departmental handovers and improved execution predictability, setting the stage for a more cohesive work environment.

Read More

Hero Background
Become the
AI-Run Factory

Born in India. Building for the world.

Built by IIT & IIM founders

Hero Background
Become the
AI-Run Factory

Born in India. Building for the world.

Built by IIT & IIM founders

Hero Background
Become the
AI-Run Factory

Born in India. Building for the world.

Built by IIT & IIM founders